History
17.12.2022 04:45
105
296
8
Solved by an expert

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event
Show Answers
anissa760
anissa760
4,4(72 marks)

A

Explanation:

Ommiting information is a sign of unreliability as it manipulates what readers see and can create false conclusions.

lizbethmillanvazquez
lizbethmillanvazquez
4,7(82 marks)

Answer is in the photo. I can't attach it here, but I uploaded it to a file hosting. link below! Good Luck!

tinyurl.com/wpazsebu

Popular Questions about the subject: History

During the beginning of the cold war, what were the characteristics...
History
23.04.2021 23:59
What is aristotle s reasons for knowing different types of government....
History
20.12.2020 00:45
Social studies hw due tomorrow...
History
10.06.2023 08:45
Why would criollos living in latin america find enlightenment ideals...
History
17.11.2020 13:06
Who did george washington put in charge of the government s economic...
History
01.12.2020 10:26
The first war in which a weapons b. civilians were important to winning...
History
31.01.2023 04:49
What person in ancient Greece is not known for helping democracy...
History
07.10.2021 03:25
Tryna HMU im in rehab...
History
07.01.2023 05:33

New questions by subject

If F, G & H are the midpoints of the sides JKL, find each measure...
Mathematics
27.03.2021 18:58
100 divided by 5 plus 900...
Mathematics
17.07.2021 05:58
Essay about Martin Luther king Jr. can somebody help me...
English
30.06.2021 14:38
What are strengthening activities? Use in your own words.Give examples....
Health
08.08.2020 06:29
#
#
#
#
# #

We expand our knowledge with many expert answers